Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 1963 — 375 U.S. 937 · caselaw · US
General
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar
375 U.S. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 9, 1963.
No. 34.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar.
Wayland B. Cedarquist on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 372 U. S. 905, to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. The motion of the American Bar Association for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, is denied.