Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GILA BEND RESERVOIR & IRRIGATION COMPANY v. LINN; SAME v. GILA WATER COMPANY, 1909 — 214 U.S. 491 · caselaw · US
General
GILA BEND RESERVOIR & IRRIGATION COMPANY v. LINN; SAME v. GILA WATER COMPANY
214 U.S. 491·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GILA BEND RESERVOIR & IRRIGATION COMPANY v. LINN. SAME v. GILA WATER COMPANY.
No. 199 of October Term, 1897, and No. 226 of October Term, 1905.
Submitted March 8, 1909.
Decided March 15, 1909.
Motions for leave to file petitions for leave to file bills of review in the lower court denied.
These cases were in.this court before. See 171 U. S. 685; 202 U. S. 270; 205 U. S. 279.
Mr. É. S. Clark for petitioner.,
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Motions for leave to file bills of review in the lower court denied.