Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Todd TAYLOR v. STATE of Arkansas

318 Ark. 763887 S.W.2d 308·Arkansas Supreme Court·1994·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Todd TAYLOR v. STATE of Arkansas CR 94-1188 887 S.W.2d 308 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 21, 1994 David R. Bridgforth, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Todd Taylor, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, David R. Bridgforth, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.