Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edgar SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1931 — 52 F.2d 1086 · caselaw · US
General
Edgar SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
52 F.2d 1086·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edgar SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6011.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 27, 1931.
Julian C. Ryer, of New York City, for appellant.
Chas. L. Redding, U. S. Atty., of Savannah, Ga.
Before BRYAN, HUTCHESON, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Sanchez, was convicted and sentenced for smuggling, as charged in the second count of the indictment, and for fraudulently and knowingly receiving after importation, as charged in the sixth count, •continuously over a period of more than a year, 20,000 quarts of intoxicating liquors, with intent to defraud the United States of its customs revenue. Error is assigned on an order overruling a demurrer to each count, on the ground of indefiniteness and of insufficiency in law.
The same form of indictment was held bad on demurrer by this court in Curtis v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 450. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is reversed.