Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louisa M. Keller, as Executrix of George Keller, Deceased et al., Appellants, v. George A. Lee, Respondent, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 606 · caselaw · US
Tax
Louisa M. Keller, as Executrix of George Keller, Deceased et al., Appellants, v. George A. Lee, Respondent
172 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louisa M. Keller, as Executrix of George Keller, Deceased et al., Appellants, v. George A. Lee, Respondent.
Keller v. Lee, 66 App. Div. 184, appeal withdrawn.
(Argued October 6, 1902;
decided October 14, 1902.)
Motion to withdraw an appeal from an' order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 18, 1901, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a now trial and granting a new trial.
L. II. Jones for motion.
Loram, I. Lewis, Jr., opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted upon paying the taxable costs of this appeal and ten dollars costs of motion.