Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Whitmore v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue; KGFL, Inc. v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue; and Houck et al. v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue, 1946 — 329 U.S. 668 · caselaw · US
General
Whitmore v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue; KGFL, Inc. v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue; and Houck et al. v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue
329 U.S. 668·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 210.
No. 211.
No. 212.
Whitmore v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue; KGFL, Inc. v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue; and Houck et al. v. Ormsbee, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue.
October 14, 1946.
Lake J. Frazier for appellants.
Arthur W. Scharfeld and Fred E. Wilson for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed. (1) Hills-borough v. Cromwell, 326 U. S. 620, 623; Matthews v. Rodgers, 284 U. S. 521, 525; (2) Union Brokerage Co. v. Jensen, 322 U. S. 202.
Reported below: 64 F. Supp. 911.