Administrative
J. H. Kartack Co. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 845·United States Customs Court·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. H. Kartack Co. v. United States
No. 4910.
Entry Nos. A 241, A 254, A 255.
Invoices dated Tokyo, Japan, October 15, 18, 25, 1935.
Certified October 18, 19, 26, 1935.
Entered at St. Paul, Minn., November 15, 23, 25, 1935.
(Decided May 13, 1940)
G. W. R. Wallace (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, Joseph Schwartz of counsel! for the plaintiff.
Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attor ney), for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Brown, Judge:]
Brown, Judge:
These appeals to reappraisement have been stipulated and submitted for decision by counsel for the parties hereto.
On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the invoiced unit prices. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.