Contracts · MBE-tested
St. Louis Amusement Co. v. United States et al.
348 U.S. 876·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 361.
St. Louis Amusement Co. v. United States et al.
Russell Hardy for petitioner.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Warren E. Baker and J. Smith Henley for the United States and the Federal Communications Commission; and Samuel I. Rosenman and Am-brose Doskow for the Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.