Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward G. Riggs et al., as Receivers of the Republic Savings and Loan Association, Respondents, v. Myron Carter et al., Appellants, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
General
Edward G. Riggs et al., as Receivers of the Republic Savings and Loan Association, Respondents, v. Myron Carter et al., Appellants
173 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward G. Riggs et al., as Receivers of the Republic Savings and Loan Association, Respondents, v. Myron Carter et al., Appellants.
Biggs v. Garter, 77 App. Div. 580, affirmed.
(Submitted January 28, 1903;
decided February 10, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 18, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
W. F. Hickey for appellants.
G. D. B. Hasbrouck and Russell S. Johnson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.