Criminal Law · MBE-tested

WILLIAM CLUFF, Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent

53 Ariz. 45790 P.2d 630·Arizona Supreme Court·1939·AZ

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Criminal No. 871. Filed May 22, 1939.] [90 Pac. (2d) 630.] WILLIAM CLUFF, Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent. Mr. W. L. Barnum, Mr. R. H. Brumback and Mr. Wm. J. Fellows, for Appellant. Mr. Joe Conway, Attorney General of Arizona, Mr. Earl Anderson, Special Assistant, and Mr. Albert M. Garcia, Assistant, for Respondent. [MAJORITY — LOCKWOOD, J.] LOCKWOOD, J. This case was argued and submitted to the court at the same time as Hoy v. State, ante, p. 440, 99 Pae. (2d) 623 (just affirmed), and it was stipulated by counsel tbat all of the legal questions raised on this appeal were also raised in Hoy v. State, supra, and tbat an affirmance of the judgment in the case last named would necessarily require an affirmance of the judgment in the present case. The judgment of the superior court herein is, therefore, affirmed. BOSS, C. J., and McALISTEB, J., concur.