Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sobell v. United States, 1957 — 355 U.S. 860 · caselaw · US
General
Sobell v. United States
355 U.S. 860·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 112,
October Term, 1952.
Sobell v. United States.
Frank J. Donner, Arthur Kinoy, Marshall Perlin and Benjamin Dreyfus for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
The motion to vacate the orders denying petitions for writ of certiorari, 344 U. S. 838, and rehearing, 344 U. S. 889, and the request for oral hearing on motion are denied.