Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General, et al. v. McClung et al., 1964 — 379 U.S. 802 · caselaw · US
General
Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General, et al. v. McClung et al.
379 U.S. 802·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 5, 1964.
No. 543.
Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General, et al. v. McClung et al.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Philip B. Heymann, Harold H. Greene and Gerald P. Choppin for appellants. Robert McD. Smith and William G. Somerville for appellees. Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III and Charles L. Black, Jr., for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellants. T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of North Carolina, as amicus curiae, in support of appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Probable jurisdiction noted. Motion of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., for leave to. file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Joint motion to expedite briefing and oral argument granted and case set for oral argument on Monday, October 5, 1964, immediately following No. 515.