Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Francis Brown et al., Appellants, v. Joseph W. Smith, Respondent; John D. Wing et al., Appellants, v. The Same, Respondent; Peter A. Welch et al., Appellants, v. The Same, Respondent, 1880 — 80 N.Y. 650 · caselaw · US
General
Francis Brown et al., Appellants, v. Joseph W. Smith, Respondent; John D. Wing et al., Appellants, v. The Same, Respondent; Peter A. Welch et al., Appellants, v. The Same, Respondent
80 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1880·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francis Brown et al., Appellants, v. Joseph W. Smith, Respondent. John D. Wing et al., Appellants, v. The Same, Respondent. Peter A. Welch et al., Appellants, v. The Same, Respondent.
(Argued March 11, 1880;
decided March 19, 1880.)
Reported below, 13 Hun, 408. .
O. F. Tracy for appellants.
Freling H. Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Guriam mem.]
Per Guriam mem.
for affirmance on opinions of General Term and of referee.
All concur, except Miller and Earl, JJ., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.