Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GONZALEZ et al. v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 1963 — 373 U.S. 542 · caselaw · US
General
GONZALEZ et al. v. CITY OF CHICAGO
373 U.S. 542·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GONZALEZ et al. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 984.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Frederic D. Houghteling, George W. Overton, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for appellants.
John C. Melaniphy, Milton P. Webster, Jr. and Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is grantéd and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.