General
In the Matter of the Application for a Subpœna Directed to Walter Pforzheimer, Appellant, Requiring Him to Testify Pursuant to a Proceeding Taken in the District Court for the District of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, for the Purpose of Taking His Testimony in an Action Therein Pending between the District Attorney for the Said District, Plaintiff, and Samuel Bottenheim, Defendant. P. J. Kooiman, Respondent
243 A.D. 698·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application for a Subpœna Directed to Walter Pforzheimer, Appellant, Requiring Him to Testify Pursuant to a Proceeding Taken in the District Court for the District of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, for the Purpose of Taking His Testimony in an Action Therein Pending between the District Attorney for the Said District, Plaintiff, and Samuel Bottenheim, Defendant. P. J. Kooiman, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Townley and Untermyer, JJ.