Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Oakwood et al., Respondents, v. The City of Syracuse, Appellant, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Oakwood et al., Respondents, v. The City of Syracuse, Appellant
168 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Oakwood et al., Respondents, v. The City of Syracuse, Appellant.
People ex rel. Oalcwood v. City of Syracuse, 59 App. Div. 626, affirmed.
(Argued October 3, 1901;
decided October 22, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made March 12, 1901, which affirmed an order of Special Term canceling an assessment against relators for the construction of a sewer.
James 8. Thorn and M. Z. Haven for appellant.
E. J. Northrup for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, ivith costs; no" opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Landon, JJ. Hot sitting: Vann, J.