Contracts · MBE-tested
Edward R. Davies, For-June 12, 1972 merly PFC, U. S. Army v. The Secretary of the Army of the United States and The Judge Advocate General of the Army
21 C.M.A. 671·United States Court of Military Appeals·1972
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 29, 1972
No. 72-24
Edward R. Davies, For-June 12, 1972 merly PFC, U. S. Army v The Secretary of the Army of the United States and The Judge Advocate General of the Army.
[MAJORITY]
On consideration of the Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that every circumstance upon which petitioner relies was either raised at trial and resolved adversely to him as a factual question, or was known to petitioner and his counsel at the time of trial or of appellate review and not raised by appropriate motion or assignment at that time, it is, by the Court, this 29th day of June 1972,
ORDERED:
That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed.