Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Paul E. Berger et al., Petitioners, v. George A. Fuller, 1904 — 193 U.S. 668 · caselaw · US
General
Paul E. Berger et al., Petitioners, v. George A. Fuller
193 U.S. 668·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Mr. James H. Peirce, Mr. George P. Fisher, Jr., and Mr. William Henry Dennis for petitioners. Mr. Douglas Dyrenforth for respondent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 570.
Paul E. Berger et al., Petitioners, v. George A. Fuller.
February 23, 1904:
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to . the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Mr. James H. Peirce, Mr. George P. Fisher, Jr., and Mr. William Henry Dennis for petitioners. Mr. Douglas Dyrenforth for respondent.