General
Sylvia Von Beck, Respondent, v. Hugo A. Thomsen et al., Appellants
167 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sylvia Von Beck, Respondent, v. Hugo A. Thomsen et al., Appellants.
(Argued May 15, 1901;
decided June 4, 1901.)
Von Beck v. Thomsen, 44 App. Div. 373, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 15, 1900, in favor of plaintiff upon the submission of a controversy on an agreed statement of facts under sections 1279-1281 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Louis C. Raegener and Eugene N. Robinson for appellants.
William G. Davies for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs;' no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Landón, Cullen and Werner, JJ.