General
The Mollie Gibson Consolidated Mining and Milling Company v. Summers
23 Colo. 263·Colorado Supreme Court·1896·CO
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Mollie Gibson Consolidated Mining and Milling Company v. Summers.
Case Followed.
For reasons stated in M. G. C. M. & M. Co. v. Sharp, ante, p. 259, the judgment in this ease is affirmed.
Error to the Court of Appeals.
Mr. James II. Beown and Mr. Milton Smith, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Chables R. Bell, Mr. C. J. Hughes, Jb., and Mr. Tyson S. Dines, for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Pee Cubiam.]
Pee Cubiam.
Substantially the same legal questions are involved in this case as in that of The Mollie Gibson Con. M. & M. Co. v. Sharp, decided at this term (ante, p. 259). The decision there controls here, and in accordance therewith the judgment of the court of appeals should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.