Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert M. Purcell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited, 1916 — 239 U.S. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Robert M. Purcell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited
239 U.S. 635·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 152.
Robert M. Purcell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Quaker Realty Company, Limited.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.
Argued and submitted January 7, 1916.
Decided January 10, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 161 Moore-Mansfield Co. v. Electrical Co., 234 U. S. 619, 624; Wil loughby v. Chicago, 235 U. S. 45; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50.
Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. William Winans Wall for the defendant in error.