General
WILSON et al. v. KELLEY, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, et al.
393 U.S. 266·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WILSON et al. v. KELLEY, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, et al.
No. 561.
Decided December 16, 1968.
Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Howard Moore, Jr., P. Walter Jones, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, and Martin Garbus for appellants.
Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion 0. Gordon, Mathew Robins, and W. Wheeler Bryan, Assistant Attorneys General, and Don L. Hartman, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.