Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Allan C. Dalzell, Appellant, v. The Fahys Watch Case Company, Respondent, 1890 — 125 N.Y. 709 · caselaw · US
General
Allan C. Dalzell, Appellant, v. The Fahys Watch Case Company, Respondent
125 N.Y. 709·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Allan C. Dalzell, Appellant, v. The Fahys Watch Case Company, Respondent.
(Argued December 15, 1890;
decided December 19, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, made May 5, 1890, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate and set aside an order for the examination of defendant’s officers, and vacated and set aside said order.
Edmund T. Oldham for appellant.
William A. Jenñet for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.