Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHEEK NEAL COFFEE COMPANY, Appellant, v. OSAKA SHOSEN KAISHA, Appellee, 1930 — 39 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
CHEEK NEAL COFFEE COMPANY, Appellant, v. OSAKA SHOSEN KAISHA, Appellee
39 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHEEK NEAL COFFEE COMPANY, Appellant, v. OSAKA SHOSEN KAISHA, Appellee.
No. 5828.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 16, 1930.
Henry P. Daxt, Jr., and Eberhard P. Deutseh, both of New Orleans, La. (Dart & Dart, of New Orleans, La., Single & Single, of New York City, and Deutseh & Kerrigan, of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for appellant.
Geo. H. Terriberry and Walter Carroll, both of New Orleans, La. (Terriberry, Young, Rault & Carroll, of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BRYAN and FOSTER, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
Rehearing denied June 21, 1930.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In this case we are content to adopt the opinion of the District Judge reported in 36 F.(2d) 256.
The decree is affirmed.