General
George S. POMEROY, Sr., Plaintiff in Error, v. Edwin L. SCOTT, Defendant in Error
10 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George S. POMEROY, Sr., Plaintiff in Error, v. Edwin L. SCOTT, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 15, 1926.)
No. 189.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Merrill, Rogers, Gifford & Woody, of New York City (Charles L. Woody, of New York City,-of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Leo Oppenheimer, of New York City (Milton P. Kupfer and Samuel H. Kaufman, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.