Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lewis Newgass, Appellant, v. Robert Salomon, Respondent; Froilau Miranda et al., Appellants, v. Same, Respondent; Julius Beer et al., Appellants, v. Same, Respondent, 1887 — 106 N.Y. 672 · caselaw · US
General
Lewis Newgass, Appellant, v. Robert Salomon, Respondent; Froilau Miranda et al., Appellants, v. Same, Respondent; Julius Beer et al., Appellants, v. Same, Respondent
106 N.Y. 672·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lewis Newgass, Appellant, v. Robert Salomon, Respondent. Froilau Miranda et al., Appellants, v. Same, Respondent. Julius Beer et al., Appellants, v. Same, Respondent.
(Submitted June 22, 1887;
decided July 1, 1887.)
Wales F, Severm.ee for appellants.
Blumenstiel <& Hirseh for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse orders of General and Special Terms, and to deny motion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.