Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank J. Mills et al., Respondents, v. N. Holmes Odell et al., Appellants, 1885 — 98 N.Y. 625 · caselaw · US
General
Frank J. Mills et al., Respondents, v. N. Holmes Odell et al., Appellants
98 N.Y. 625·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank J. Mills et al., Respondents, v. N. Holmes Odell et al., Appellants.
(Argued December 16, 1884;
decided January 20, 1885.)
Reversed upon ground that the evidence did not sustain the findings.
Galvin Frost and Francis La/rMn for appellants.
Wilson Brown for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Andrews, J.,]
Andrews, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.