General
Hannah Jane Marden, Respondent, v. Ella M. Dorthy et al., Appellants
158 N.Y. 706·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hannah Jane Marden, Respondent, v. Ella M. Dorthy et al., Appellants.
(Argued February 27, 1899;
decided March 7, 1899.)
Reported below, 12 App. Div. 188.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 23, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an EquityTerm.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the notice of appeal was not served on plaintiff’s attorney and that no undertaking has been given.
Henry Selden Bacon for motion.
John Van Voorhis c& Sons opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, unless the appellants file an undertaking perfecting their appeal within ten days and pay ten dollars costs of this motion.