Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Woods, Court Trustee, v. Indemnity Insurance Co.; and Same v. Granada Apartments, Inc., et al., 1939 — 308 U.S. 557 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Woods, Court Trustee, v. Indemnity Insurance Co.; and Same v. Granada Apartments, Inc., et al.
308 U.S. 557·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration and decision of this application. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that the petition for writs of certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 249.
No. 250.
Woods, Court Trustee, v. Indemnity Insurance Co.; and Same v. Granada Apartments, Inc., et al.
October 9, 1939.
Mr. Weightstill Woods for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration and decision of this application. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that the petition for writs of certiorari should be granted.
Reported below: 104 F. 2d 528.