Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jane Higgins, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Village of Glens Falls, Appellant, 1891 — 124 N.Y. 666 · caselaw · US
General
Jane Higgins, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Village of Glens Falls, Appellant
124 N.Y. 666·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jane Higgins, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Village of Glens Falls, Appellant.
(Argued March 12, 1891;
decided April 7, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made September 25, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Iiioha/rd L. Hand for appellant.
J. S. FAmoreaux for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.