General

BENITO MACIOS GALVAN et al., Appellants, v. EDWIN W. BARNETT et al., Respondents

50 Cal. App. 2d 856·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1942·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Civ. No. 13520. Second Dist., Div. Two. Mar. 25, 1942.] BENITO MACIOS GALVAN et al., Appellants, v. EDWIN W. BARNETT et al., Respondents. Samuel Mirman and Samuel Rubenstein for Appellants. Frank Karr, E. E. Morris, C. W. Cornell, O. O. Collins and Randolph Karr for Respondents. [MAJORITY — THE COURT.] THE COURT. The respondents having filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that all of the grounds stated in the motion are supported by said certificate and by the authorities cited. It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it is, hereby dismissed.