General

Matilda Sexton, Respondent, v. G. F. Harvey Company et al., Appellants. Dewitt Sexton, Respondent, v. G. F. Harvey Company et al., Appellants

274 A.D. 864·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1948·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Matilda Sexton, Respondent, v. G. F. Harvey Company et al., Appellants. Dewitt Sexton, Respondent, v. G. F. Harvey Company et al., Appellants. [MAJORITY] Appeal by the defendants in both actions from an order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for an examination of the defendants before trial for the purpose of enabling the plaintiffs to prepare their complaints. The record amply demonstrates the necessity and propriety of the examination sought. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to each respondent. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster, Russell and Deyo, JJ.