General
In the Matter of Ahmad Khatib et al., as Parents of Chirstina Khatib and Another, Infants, Appelants, v. Liverpool Central School District, Respondent
244 A.D.2d 957668 N.Y.S.2d 130·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1997·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Ahmad Khatib et al., as Parents of Chirstina Khatib and Another, Infants, Appelants, v Liverpool Central School District, Respondent.
[668 NYS2d 130]
[MAJORITY]
—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners, as limited by their brief, do not challenge any part of the judgment on appeal, but instead challenge only dicta in Supreme Court’s decision. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Schuster v Schweitzer, 203 AD2d 552). In any event, because the children have been readmitted to respondent school district, the appeal is moot. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tormey, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Denman, P. J., Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.