General
John P. Bath, Respondent, v. George Wahlig and Antoni Bergan, Appellants
235 A.D. 702·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1932·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John P. Bath, Respondent, v. George Wahlig and Antoni Bergan, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order of the City Court of Mount Vernon striking from defendants’ answer the first separate defense, the first counterclaim and the second partial counterclaim on the ground of insufficiency, and the second separate defense as sham, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ,No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.