Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward SILVER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1926 — 12 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
Edward SILVER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
12 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward SILVER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 24, 1926.)
No. 3416.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; John Rellstab, Judge.
Carl Kisselman, of Camden, N. J., for plaintiffs in error.
Walter G. Winne, of Hackensack, N. J., for the United States.
Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and THOMSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This case turns on the question whether certain articles here involved were designed for use in the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor.
This court being of opinion the evidence did not warrant such finding, the order of the court below, denying a return of said articles, is reversed.