Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniel Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. The Union Mutual Life Insurance Company et al., Appellants, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 628 · caselaw · US
General
Daniel Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. The Union Mutual Life Insurance Company et al., Appellants
110 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. The Union Mutual Life Insurance Company et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 5, 1888;
decided June 12, 1888.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made July 23, 1886, reversing a judgment dismissing the complaint entered upon trial at Special Term.
William G. Wilson for motion.
Merrett E. Sawyer opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Motion granted.