Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of C. H. ELLIOTTE, Trustee, to Revise an Order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee in the case of Louis GOODMAN, Bankrupt, 1927 — 19 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of the Petition of C. H. ELLIOTTE, Trustee, to Revise an Order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee in the case of Louis GOODMAN, Bankrupt
19 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of C. H. ELLIOTTE, Trustee, to Revise an Order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee in the case of Louis GOODMAN, Bankrupt.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
January 4, 1927.
No. 4552.
Petition to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; Harry B. Anderson, Judge.
McDonald & McDonald and J. A. Osoinach, all of Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner.
Barton & Barton and Keeble T. Herron, both of Memphis, Tenn., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel.