Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
JEROME H. REMICK & COMPANY v. STERN, 1909 — 215 U.S. 585 · caselaw · US
General
JEROME H. REMICK & COMPANY v. STERN
215 U.S. 585·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JEROME H. REMICK & COMPANY v. STERN.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR .THE ' SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
No. 352.
Submitted November 8, 1909.
Decided November 15, 1909.
Writ of error to the Circuit Court dismissed for want of final judgment on authority of McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661.
Mr. Moses H. Grossman for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Julius Henry Cohen for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for want of final judgment. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Pfaelzer v. Bach Fur Company of Illinois, decided November 8, 1909, antep. 584.