Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BLAKE v. FOURTH NATIONAL BANK; BLAKE v. PARK BANK; KENNY v. PHILADELPHIA &c. RAILROAD, 1875 — 154 U.S. 616 · caselaw · US
General
BLAKE v. FOURTH NATIONAL BANK; BLAKE v. PARK BANK; KENNY v. PHILADELPHIA &c. RAILROAD
154 U.S. 616·Supreme Court of the United States·1875
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BLAKE v. FOURTH NATIONAL BANK. BLAKE v. PARK BANK. KENNY v. PHILADELPHIA &c. RAILROAD.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
• ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Nos. 554, 555 and 318.
Argued February 19, 1875.
Decided March 22, 1875.
Blake v. National Bank's, 23 Wall. 307, followed.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Hunt]
Mr. Justice Hunt
delivered the opinion of the court.
These cases involve the same principles as the case of the National City Bank, (Blake v. National Banks, 23 Wall. 307,) and the judgment in each case is Reversed.
Mr. Attorney General for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Charles C. Beaman, Jr., and Mr. Francis C. Barlow for the Banks, and Mr. James E. Gowen for the Railroad Co.