Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph W. Cody, et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Joseph W. Cody & Company, Appellants, v. The Turn Verein of the City of New York et al., Respondents, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph W. Cody, et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Joseph W. Cody & Company, Appellants, v. The Turn Verein of the City of New York et al., Respondents
167 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph W. Cody, et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Joseph W. Cody & Company, Appellants, v. The Turn Verein of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
(Submitted May 21, 1901;
decided June 4, 1901.)
Cody v. Turn Verein, 48 App. Div. 279, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 26, 1900, afiirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
William H. Newman and Albert J. Adams, Jr., foi‘ appellants. '
A. J. Simpson and Benjamin N. Oardozo for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.