Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the Lehigh Valley Railway Company for the appointment of Commissioners to ascertain and determine the points and manner of crossing the tracks and lands of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company in the city of Buffalo, 1883 — 93 N.Y. 639 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of the Lehigh Valley Railway Company for the appointment of Commissioners to ascertain and determine the points and manner of crossing the tracks and lands of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company in the city of Buffalo
93 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the Lehigh Valley Railway Company for the appointment of Commissioners to ascertain and determine the points and manner of crossing the tracks and lands of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company in the city of Buffalo.
(Argued June 19, 1883 ;
decided June 29, 1883.)
Daniel H. McMillan for appellant.
George J. Sicard for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
“ The order is affirmed on the ground that the question of the point of crossing may be tried before the commission and will be subject to review.”
All concur, except Andrews, J., absent.
Order affirmed.