Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Ocean Lodge No. 76, et al. v. Tunstall et al., 1947 — 332 U.S. 841 · caselaw · US
General
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Ocean Lodge No. 76, et al. v. Tunstall et al.
332 U.S. 841·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 404.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Ocean Lodge No. 76, et al. v. Tunstall et al.
Harold C. Heiss, Russell B. Day, William G. Maupin and Ralph M. Hoyt for petitioners.
Charles H. Houston and Joseph C. Waddy for respondents.
James B. McDonough, Jr., W. R. C. Cocke and Frank J. Wideman filed a brief for the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co., as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.