Contracts · MBE-tested
KELLEY et al. v. DIAMOND DRILL & MACHINE CO.
129 F. 756·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KELLEY et al. v. DIAMOND DRILL & MACHINE CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
April 27, 1904.)
No. 1.
1. Patents — Infringement—Coil Clasps foe Fastening Belts.
The Jackson patent, No. 433,791, for a coil clasp for fastening belts, etc., claim 7, construed, and held infringed on rehearing.
Acheson,,Circuit Judge, dissenting.
On Rehearing.
For former opinion, see 123 Fed. 882.
Before ACHESON and DALLAS, Circuit Judges, and BUFFING-TON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Since the reargument, this case has again received the attentive consideration of the court, with the result that the judges respectively adhere to their views as heretofore expressed. 123 Fed. 882, 59 C. C. A. 370. The decree of the court below therefore stands affirmed upon the opinion of the majority of the court on file.