General
CHARLES A. SENK vs. DANBURY NATIONAL BANK ET AL.
13 Conn. Supp. 234·Connecticut Superior Court·1945·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHARLES A. SENK vs. DANBURY NATIONAL BANK ET AL.
Superior Court New Haven County
File No. 64457
MEMORANDUM FILED FEBRUARY 27, 1945.
Pouzzner, Hadden, Kopkind & Hadden, of New Haven, for the Plaintiff.
Albert Aston, of Woodbury, and Bronson, Lewis, Bronson & Upson, of Waterbury, for the Defendants.
[MAJORITY — WYNNE, J.]
WYNNE, J.
The court is of the opinion that the reasons urged in 'support of the motion are more persuasive than the fact that the attorneys for the plaintiff are located in New Haven and the plaintiff himself has his headquarters in New York. This would seem to be a case which should be tried in Waterbury. No inconvenience appearing for plaintiff or his counsel, the motion for transfer is granted.