Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
D. W. Dinsmore, Appellant, v. Stephen B. Wood, and Albert Sartain, Agent of the State of Ohio, 1910 — 218 U.S. 689 · caselaw · US
General
D. W. Dinsmore, Appellant, v. Stephen B. Wood, and Albert Sartain, Agent of the State of Ohio
218 U.S. 689·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 746.
D. W. Dinsmore, Appellant, v. Stephen B. Wood, and Albert Sartain, Agent of the State of Ohio.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
October 31, 1910.
No one opposing.
[MAJORITY]
Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Karl T. Webber for the appellees.