Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph P. Toms, Respondent, v. Henry Greenwood et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents, 1892 — 130 N.Y. 687 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph P. Toms, Respondent, v. Henry Greenwood et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents
130 N.Y. 687·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph P. Toms, Respondent, v. Henry Greenwood et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents.
(Argued December 16, 1891;
decided January 20, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Buffalo, made April 9,1890, which denied a motion for a new trial and affirmed an interlocutory judgment, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Simon, Fleischmcmn for appellant.
Framik G. Ferguson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.