General
Charles Pope CALDWELL and George E. POLHEMUS, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Caldwell & Polhemus. Plaintiffs in Error (Plaintiffs Below), v. George A. CARDEN, Defendant in Error (Defendant Below)
297 F. 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Pope CALDWELL and George E. POLHEMUS, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Caldwell & Polhemus. Plaintiffs in Error (Plaintiffs Below), v. George A. CARDEN, Defendant in Error (Defendant Below).
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 7, 1924.)
No. 313.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Ralpli E. Slayton, of New York City (Gordon S. P. Kleeberg an'd Jacob M. Rosenfeld, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error.
Battle, Vandiver, Levy & Van Tine, of New York City (George Gordon Battle, Almuth C. Vandiver, and Ludlow S. Fowler, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.