Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
STEWART v. CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY, 1969 — 393 U.S. 482 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
STEWART v. CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY
393 U.S. 482·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
STEWART v. CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY.
No. 752,
Misc.
Decided January 27, 1969.
Marshall Patner for petitioner.
Henry F. Jankowicz for respondent.
Peter 8. Smith, Joseph A. Matera, Kenneth F. Phillips, and Robert J. Spangenberg for the National Project on Urban Housing Law et al., as amid curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion of the National Project on Urban Housing Law et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Thorpe v. Housing Authority of the City of Durham, ante, p. 268.