Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George H. Neidlinger, Respondent, v. The Onward Construction Company, Appellant, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
George H. Neidlinger, Respondent, v. The Onward Construction Company, Appellant
188 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George H. Neidlinger, Respondent, v. The Onward Construction Company, Appellant.
(Argued March 13, 1907;
decided April 2, 1907.)
Neidlinger v. Onward Constr. Co., 107 App. Div. 398, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate.Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 8,1906, affirming a judgment in favor of. plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover on contracts for labor and materials alleged to have been furnished.
Ernest Hall, John G. Fisher, Hira/m li. Fisher and Albert H Gleason for appellant.
Franlc Harvey Fields R. Percy Chittenden and Walter Lester Glenney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Yann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.