Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Savannah, Florida and Western Railway Company v. Florida Fruit Exchange, 1897 — 167 U.S. 512 · caselaw · US
General
Savannah, Florida and Western Railway Company v. Florida Fruit Exchange
167 U.S. 51242 L. Ed. 257·Supreme Court of the United States·1897
Mr. Justice Harlan dissented.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Savannah, Florida and Western Railway Company v. Florida Fruit Exchange.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
No. 141.
Argued November 5,1896.
Decided May 24, 1897.
Mr. John E. Hartridge for appellant. Mr. R. G. Erwin was on the brief.
Mr. Charles M. Cooper for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Brewer]
Mr. Justice Brewer
delivered the opinion of the court. The conclusions announced in the case just decided dispose of this; and for the reasons stated in' that opinion, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case remanded to the Circuit Court, with instructions to enter a decree for the defendant, dismissing the bill without prejudice.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissented.